One filmmaker’s fight against the cyberlockers

Ellen Seidler Fortune magazine

In late 2006, Ellen Seidler, a Harvard-educated filmmaker, journalist, and journalism teacher, decided to make a feature movie with a friend, Megan Siler, a UCLA film school grad. Called And Then Came Lola, it was an homage to a German independent film they loved, and was a lesbian romantic comedy.

“We developed the script, we cast the film, and then we shot the film,” Seidler says. “When all was said and done, it cost close to a quarter of a million dollars.”

 

Ellen Seidler in Fortune magazineIn late 2006, Ellen Seidler, a Harvard-educated filmmaker, journalist, and journalism teacher, decided to make a feature movie with a friend, Megan Siler, a UCLA film school grad. Called And Then Came Lola, it was an homage to a German independent film they loved, and was a lesbian romantic comedy.

“We developed the script, we cast the film, and then we shot the film,” Seidler says. “When all was said and done, it cost close to a quarter of a million dollars.”

They financed the movie the way independent filmmakers do. “I took out a second mortgage, borrowed against my retirement, went into credit card debt,” says Seidler. “Not necessarily smart things, but that’s what we did.”

In June 2009, Lola screened to a sold-out crowd at the Frameline Festival in San Francisco, the premier lesbian-gay film event, and it later showed at scores of other festivals. Like many independent films, Lola had no theatrical release. It was distributed at first by DVD and later by download and streaming as those methods become available. Today legitimate versions are available in nine languages, through such outlets as Amazon (AMZN, -1.93%), iTunes, Netflix (NFLX, -1.22%), two worldwide video-on-demand services — Buskfilms and WolfeOnDemand — and an iPhone app. Legitimate streams are available for as little as $2.99.

Though Seidler knew the film would be pirated over peer-to-peer sites like ThePirateBay, she and her distributor considered those methods too geeky for most people. But by spring 2010, when the DVD came out, the plunging costs of data storage had combined with dramatic improvements in streaming technologies to catapult cyberlockers like Megaupload to the fore as the simplest way to see movies for free.

Within 24 hours of release, Seidler began seeing links to pirated copies of Lola on the web. Soon there were thousands. The links were mainly on ad-supported blogs and led to copies stored on commercial cyberlockers. She began emailing DMCA takedown notices — 1,200 in a single weekend in May 2010 — to cyberlockers, blogs, blog hosts (like Google Blogger), and ad networks (like Google AdSense), but it was “like putting up an umbrella under Niagara Falls,” she says. She showed Fortune spreadsheets corroborating that she has had, to date, well over 56,000 links to pirated copies of her film taken down. “It didn’t take me long to realize that this wasn’t about sharing,” Seidler says.

“It was about people making money.” And it wasn’t just pirates who were making money. The ads were often being served by Google (GOOG, -1.26%), adBrite, or other American companies, and, weirdly, the ads themselves were often for legitimate companies, like Deutsche Bank (DB, +1.57%) affiliates and even Netflix, which was one of Seidler’s distributors. Furious, Seidler launched her own site, called popuppirates.com, to “document the connection between piracy and profits” and to show how mainstream companies were profiting from this black market.

“I got to say it galled me to see Google making money off my film, and the pirate-operator making money, and we’re still in debt,” says Seidler. “There’s something wrong with that.” A Google spokesperson did not respond to inquiries seeking comment, except to acknowledge their receipt. (At a congressional hearing last November, a Google lawyer testified that the company more than complies with its duties under the DMCA, having taken down more than 5 million items that year and having shut down more than 150,000 AdWords accounts. According to the government’s January indictment against the cyberlocker Megaupload, Google also stopped serving ads for Megaupload in 2007 after finding “numerous pages” linking to “copyrighted content.”)

For its first quarter, Lola made less than a fourth of what its distributor, Wolfe Video, had anticipated. “There’s a market that hungers for this product,” says Maria Lynn, the president of Wolfe, which has been distributing LGBT films for 27 years. Cyberlockers made the difference, she maintains.

“Pirates fall into two categories,” says Wolfe Video founder Kathy Wolfe. “The first would be happy to pay if they could find the legitimate version of the movie. That’s incentivizing us to make that happen. But the second are the people who don’t believe they should have to pay ever. That that would have any legitimacy as a position is staggering to me.”

 

Stopping Piracy by Following the Money Trail

Follow the money

Follow the money

The idea of targeting websites financially goes back as far as there has been money changing hands on the Internet. However, the more recent history of it began when director Ellen Seidler launched the site PopUpPirates.com in 2010 (previous coverage), where she began to highlight many of the companies whose ads ran next to pirate downloads of her content.

(Note: Seidler now does most of her blogging at Vox Indie.)

Though Seidler began to receive some significant media attention, it wouldn’t be until December 2011 that the idea would take the national stage.

 

 

 

Full article here at Plagiarism Today

PopUp Pirates: Who Profits from Piracy?

Who Profits from Piracy

Who Profits from PiracyEllen Seidler is an independent filmmaker who, after spending $250,000 of her own money, made the lesbian romantic comedy “And Then Came Lola“.

However, even before the movie was officially released, it was leaked on a variety of pirate sites, often times hosted at various “file locker” services that would offer the video for download.

Seidler then began to defend her work on the Web, filing DMCA takedown notices by the dozen against file locker sites and advertising networks.

But Seidler noticed something she considered disturbing. Nearly all the pirate sites had advertisements on them, but they weren’t for companies with poor reputations, but rather, were for mainstream companies, many of which were in the U.S. These companies included Netflix, Microsoft, Network Solutions and many others.

In early July, Seidler was features on All Things Considered on NPR, where she talked about these issues and a representative from Netflix said that they try to avoid pirate sites but some simply fall through the cracks.

Shortly after that podcast, Seidler launched her own site and blog about her ordeals, PopUp Pirates, where she highlights the companies who advertise with pirates, in particular Google and vents her frustration at the time and energy spent enforcing the film and how all parties involved, the pirate site, Google and the advertiser, make money from the film but she does not.

GaydarNation.com Interviews Ellen & Megan

Directors Megan Siler & Ellen Seidler

So what was it about Run Lola Run that inspired you to write and direct your own version?
Megan: I think we both thought it was a great film obviously, but it affords you a lot of freedom to play with the media. The structure’s like Groundhog Day and this idea of doing something over and over and trying to get it right seemed perfect for a lesbian romp.

Ellen: What you alluded to really opened up the narrative possibilities and when you’re dealing with a low budget film, the fact that you can have great animation and integrate stills and kind of play with it in that way, it allows you some creative opportunities that you might not normally have.

Obviously it’s a hat tip to Run Lola Run and we named our character Lola because we didn’t want to pretend that it wasn’t, but it’s a very different film in many, many ways. We definitely thought the structure would be fun. It’s about having a fun time. It’s a little more up than the original.

Megan: Also, as a romantic comedy or a romp, it sounds a little fantastical. I think the pastiche of media and the whole kind of mixing of it allows you to be playful.

How did you go about casting the film? Did you have specific actresses in mind?
Ellen: Not initially. We did some casting in San Francisco and we found one actress up there called Jenoa Harlow who’s an out lesbian and plays the girl in the park with the dog. She’s wonderful but there really isn’t the pool of acting talent in the Bay area of San Francisco.

Megan: Ellen and I really wanted to work local.

Ellen: So we went down to LA and had open castings. We were really determined after that to find some actors who were actually lesbians, so we did some targeted castings and that’s how we found most of the people in our cast. We thought it was important for the success of this film that we had actors who understood the lesbian vibe.

We had a number of actors come through who were talented enough but it just seemed as if it would have been somewhat of a stretch to embrace the role they were going to be asked to play. And the sexuality, there’s a lot of that in the film and for them to be comfortable with that is a hurdle. Plus, I think it’s just great that we can have talented out lesbians in our film and show off their talent.

Megan: It’s also great for us because they understood and felt very supportive of the project. It ended up being a very collaborative film. The more people who are onboard and want to support this kind of project really helps independent filmmakers.

Go here to read the full interview in GaydarNation.com.